Printable View
Hey guys,
I was recently in need of more resources and looked at my options. I could either boost my collectors or fill my storages using gems. I did some math and figured that filling my storages was by far the most gem-saving, efficient way to go. It is instant, and you end up actually gaining more resources. I think SuperCell needs to decrease the price of boosting collectors because right now they are definitely not the way to go.
Do you remember 2-3 updates ago? Yeah they already did this!
He means the price to decrease permanently for the boost not temporarily
After the 1 gem boost event, they DID permanently decrease the boosting of collectors!Quote:
Originally Posted by Demonicacid
Uhm, what about raiding?
Quote:
Originally Posted by 457sandwiches
Oh i didn't know they permanently decreased them to, nice :). Anyways attacking is the best way to to get loot, th7 your fully c apable of getting 1mil elixir a hour, th6 i was doing around 500k a hour. Thats just of one resource. So why not save your gems, and just attack?
Its still too muchQuote:
Originally Posted by 457sandwiches
Haha agreed! I'm only saying that they probably wont decrease it again.Quote:
Originally Posted by SwiftVelocity
Not sure how you arrived at the conclusion that it is cheaper.Quote:
Originally Posted by SwiftVelocity
Assuming you have maxed collectors you gain 6545 resources/gem by boosting collectors. To fill max storages is 2467 gems or 3243 resources/gem.
It costs twice as much to instafill storages.
Dahimi is completely right here, he beat me to saying it.Quote:
Originally Posted by dahimi