Originally Posted by
Tomville
You are missing something, I think. The usual line of thought is that engineering hurts casuals both because they don't engineer themselves and because they are the primary prey of engineers, most likely to be in the wider th spread mixed lineup family and friends clans. That hurts the game because it means they can win less wars than they would have done if matched with other friends and family clans, and so have less fun than they would have done at war and are more likely to drop out of warring altogether. So when someone says something like "the matchmaker advantage from engineering should be kerbed for the betterment of the game" they aren't trying to speak for the casuals as if they shared that mentality, or pretending to represent a majority, but rather are speaking up to say something both sensible and plausible going from pretty well established facts about engineering, people's enjoyment, and what happens when people perceive systematic unfairness or excess difficulty (such as being repeatedly beaten up by bigger troops than any of them have).