Darian tell us,is supercell working on a way to fix Legend League clouds?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by scysk

I'm sorry, but this is the only, correct answer.

Probably clouds wasn't the way the game was intended to be played in the higher levels, but since they have been in the game FOR YEARS, it seems that clouds didn't stop Clash from being as successful as it is today.

Even though Supercell loves fixing stuff that isn't broken, in this case it would be a terrible financial decision to mess up with how the WHALES have been playing for years.

I would go even so far to say that fixing clouds would be Supercell's "last gamble" before the game starts dying (similar to how Supercell abolished cheap shilding).

---

I don't follow. Not in the slightest. How do clouds encourage gemming in any way? In fact, I dare say people spend LESS in the clouds. What do they have to gem? You can't gem cloud time. But if they didn't have to wait for hours to attack, maybe we would see top players boosting or gemming armies to get back into the fray.

Where's the money if they DON'T fix the clouds?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by scysk

I'm sorry, but this is the only, correct answer.

Probably clouds wasn't the way the game was intended to be played in the higher levels, but since they have been in the game FOR YEARS, it seems that clouds didn't stop Clash from being as successful as it is today.

Even though Supercell loves fixing stuff that isn't broken, in this case it would be a terrible financial decision to mess up with how the WHALES have been playing for years.

I would go even so far to say that fixing clouds would be Supercell's "last gamble" before the game starts dying (similar to how Supercell abolished cheap shilding).

---

What's the point of saying this when Darian just stated the opposite 20 minutes earlier in the very previous post

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 'Darian[Supercell

Reducing shield times may not necessarily be the right answer. Having shorter shield times means players will just hop online more often or for longer stretches of time to avoid being attacked while trying to find more bases to attack. .

---

Sir have you look into why those top leader on board have such a longer stretches of time and can do more attacked.... Just look at the top player as of now with only 6days after new season while other floats waiting for the cloud.....

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tiler

I don't follow. Not in the slightest. How do clouds encourage gemming in any way? In fact, I dare say people spend LESS in the clouds. What do they have to gem? You can't gem cloud time. But if they didn't have to wait for hours to attack, maybe we would see top players boosting or gemming armies to get back into the fray.

Where's the money if they DON'T fix the clouds?

---

Please, next time read carefully.

Where did I say clouds encourage gemming?

I quoted:

There's no money in it for them if they fix clouds.

Which is entirely different.

To the idea about multiplayer matchmaking being based on base weight they won't implement that. It will make engineered bases godlike because you will take away their weakness. Being bullied in multi. So not a good idea there, I think the confuzed1 is confused. :

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by scysk

Please, next time read carefully.

Where did I say clouds encourage gemming?

I quoted:

There's no money in it for them if they fix clouds.

Which is entirely different.

---

Please, read more carefully. I provided specific examples of how fixing clouding COULD increase gemming. There's definitely no money in it for them if they don't fix it at all. And as Darian has said on numerous occasions, it's on the to-do list, so why insist on such a negative view?

So, as our learned friend from SC has just told us, there's no solution as yet.

Some ideas but no solution, and I worry that some of the cures being suggested might well be worse than the disease

the discussion is going nowhere, it's just (as it is when trying to find a match) a waiting game.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jesterdeath

Add dummy bases?
expand the search criteria so that legends/high titans can hit lower?

---

I suggested this over a year ago and got stomped on by the forum trolls about how this would ruin the game. If they took and encompassed the entire player population search in the matching it would eliminate the clouds in an instance. The only downside I could see is there would be no more hiding in the lower leagues......no more TH11 in silver.....would that really be so bad? Is the game not called CLASH of clans. Perhaps they should rename it farmville. If they simply took and changed the matching slightly so that players of the same TH level were available to be matched across the entire spectrum the clouds would vanish instantly.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Darian[Supercell]

I'm not really sure what you're expecting me to say on this apart from what's already been said. I know it sounds like a broken record but it is something the team is looking into and has been.

---

Nailed it with the 2nd reply to the thread. XD

Player vs. Player, legend match legend, if not legend you aren't in the match, keep lower leagues the same as now, ignore trophies (other than of course enough to be legend) for the player vs player match, all matches worth the same amount of trophies, loot limit, each star won/lost worth 5 trophies with % the tiebreaker, can't see the name of the person you are attacking or their clan, clouds are gone.

However, now comes a hard decision. If you don't limit the number of attacks per day, then the same people that now complain they can't compete with the top will still be unable to compete with the top. On the other hand, if you do limit the number of attacks per day, the little reason there was to spend gems before goes away. Perhaps this is countered by forcing each person to go on defense once per day (a titan would attack them) unless they spend 10 gems or something.