Printable View
Recently, every person who created their account in India was placed in a global together. This was done to make it easier for everyone to find like-minded people to chat to.
Based on many observations since the Indian separation, I think the Banglaeshi culture seems far more similar to India than say USA, Canada, UK, Australia, New Zealand etc. I often find two tiers of chat on global, Bangladesh and then everyone else.
Are there any plans to place Bangladesh in that same global?
As one who lives in the USA, I don't know why they were not moved with them in the first place. They do seem to have a similar manner of speaking in the chat, culture, and time zone.
Unfortunately for you, global is not divided on the basis of culture. And how do you find someone's culture on a chat ?
Your "many observations" regarding similar culture is wrong too as there is no similar culture between India and Bangladesh.
And no, there should not be any plans to place bangladesh in same global as ours (Indian global ).
I would rather have two knobs that a player can have to control their global chat: language and locale, where the default for both are "any" and "any". So if for example I am an English speaker working for a year in Saudi Arabia, I can set those two things and find people near me who speak my language, and if there happen to be none, I can set a different locale or go back to "any". For another example, if I am a student learning another language, I can set the language to the one that I am learning in order to converse with others who speak that language.
This would give a lot more flexibility to the chat system. Not only would it let people find those who are geographically close, but clan families could pick seldom used locales and use global to chat amongst themselves.
People will soon start asking about for separate global for U.S.. Then they will start asking for Cali , N.Y., Texas etc global. After that town's and village to follow.
I am not a native English speaker. So can someone actually explain me what the word "GLOBAL " means? I think I have wrong idea about it
I do not think that will happen. The complaint is about use of different languages in global, not about actual geographical concerns. If someone from British Columbia is in global or someone from Georgia USA, they will speak English; the same cannot be said of Bangladeshi in global.Quote:
Originally Posted by Nahid314
And yes, it is called global, but the language choice of global is convieniently left out when people use that argument. ITS GLOBAL. Yes, it is global. And I chose English as my choice of language for global. I also speak French but rather slowly, so I do sometimes like to get into FRENCH language global, where I speak FRENCH and not English.
Do not confuse my post as a complaint about global. I have found global to be quite enjoyable and with my work schedule I guess I have found English only speakers in my times online.
Since Indian global has already reached its worst possible state I think doing any changes won't make it any worse.
Global has more than 1 definition in the English language. It appears like most non-native speakers are aware of the definition that means "world wide".Quote:
Originally Posted by Nahid314
It can also mean "relating to the whole" or "group".
Some are feeling segregated because they thought they were taken out of the "world wide" when in reality they only changed groups.
I cannot deny... I want to be a fly on that wall. I want to see what that global is like sooooo badly.Quote:
Originally Posted by Praveenkumar12
Culture was probably the wrong word, I think I should've used the word behaviour.Quote:
Originally Posted by bhavyamamgain
The behaviour of the Bangladeshi people I see in global is remarkably similar to how a lot of the Indian people behaved.
+1! I want to see what it looks like now the chickens have come home to roost!Quote:
Originally Posted by Cilakila
How would SC prevent a person from using a different language than what the language setting is configured? As we have seen in the past and even now. People will still use the language of their choice no matter what language settings they have. We have seen this in the past when India was still grouped along with NA\AUS\UK. People are also using non-Norsk language when they have they language settings in Norsk.Quote:
Originally Posted by littledoctor
Having a locale settings where one can choose which a different region would negate the change that was recently made to separate accounts that originated from India back into the NA\AUS\UK region.
I am a Bangladeshi and I too find many Indians and Bangladeshi annoying. It's because around 70% players of this game in Bangladesh/ India are kids and immatures. So lack of mature players is a reason. But South Asian developing countries like Bangladesh/ Indian kids are not raised like the rest of the developed countries. Not all of them are well behaved cause many of em lack morality, loyalty and their English skills are not very good.
With that said not every Bangladeshi and Indians are the same. I often find nice people from Bangladesh and India on global chat. I just ignore or mute the Bangladeshi and Indian kids who bugs me or says something like free co, any girl, or swears.
I have bad news for you, friend. This describes "developed countries" kids as well.Quote:
Originally Posted by shuvo030
My point was just that you can't always expect good from majority of players from Bangladesh or India which are kids.Quote:
Originally Posted by littledoctor
Its not just behaviour/culture though, I find it a lot easier to chat and joke with people from AU,US,NZ,CA,UK etc, when I try to have the same converstaions with people from Bangladesh, they either dont understand or get offended.
People from USA and Canada are not exactly the same, but have a lot of common interests and can usually get along well.
People from Australia an New Zealand are not exactly the same, but have a lot of common interests and can usually get along well.
Surely people from India and Bangladesh, though not exactly the same either, must have ccommon interests and get along better than with the western countries?
But it is divided up by location. You say there should be no plans to include Bangladesh with India, why? Why do you think that? I've heard from many Indians here that they wish their global contained more than one country. Why do you think it more appropriate to combine Bangladesh with North America than India?Quote:
Originally Posted by bhavyamamgain
That whole region should be in the same global. Not just part of it.
Their player mindset is exactly the same.Quote:
Originally Posted by BraveClasher69
Now instead of 'any girl or need a g/f' occurring 5000 times day (pre update) it occurs 1000 times a day now from these player types.
"Global" (pron. Gló-ball): Commonly described as "a place in COC which only contains players I like and say the things I want them to say".Quote:
Originally Posted by Nahid314
What !!!!!! close this thread you are just trolling U don't know anything about india how bd and Indian culture can be same they both are separate and mind your business why U care about india and Bangladesh? Since they mainly speak Bengali how U assume all indians speak Bengali? Stop this nonsense plz
Why do you think Bangladesh should be with North America rather than India? Personally, I think global is pretty good now and I don't care if they make this change. However, if we really stop and think about it, it would make more sense for Bangladesh to be with India than to stay with North America.Quote:
Originally Posted by darshan978
Why do you think everyone wants bangladesh to be with north america. We aren't saying that. Give them their own global or place them anywhere we don't care. But why with us ?Quote:
Originally Posted by 2222
The ones who aren't from India and bangladesh should not have any business in telling where these 2 countries should be placed tbh. You can always complain about other countries being in your global but shouldn't be suggesting where should they be placed. That's SC's job.
And again.... India and bangladesh don't share same language or culture. And then placing them together in english global would not make ANY sense and hence SC hasn't done that.
Can u plz share screenshot of I need a gf 4000 time from indians!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by ClashPlayerZ
Stop complaining about global rather play game coc is not for chatting
Global is part of playing the game.Quote:
Originally Posted by darshan978
You never use it then?
in an ideal situation, giving BD (Bangladeshi) players their own server makes perfect sense. Their number right now is 50% of the western region.Quote:
Originally Posted by bhavyamamgain
I think what 2222 was saying is that if there are two options only and one has to pick one: would it be better to put BD with North America or with India? Neither are ideal of course and each has its own pros and cons. But which is the best compromise?
Concerning the language, Culture and compatibility. Here serveral facts which you know better than me, but i am pointing them out for everybody else.
1) Bangladesh is located east of India within the indian continent. Just quick look at the map, they are connected with each other.
2) historically, Bangladesh was part of India before the separation. The BD people were part of indian cast system.
3) during the war of 1971, India supported Bangladesh against Pakistan.
4) while India has many languages, one of the official languages is Bangla (bengali). It is spoken by eastern states of India. One of the main cities of India is Kolkata in which Bangla is the main language.
5) My observation now is that so many BD players are part of indian clans. I also saw many Indian players (especially from kolkata) joining a BD clan.
6) when the two regions were combined, i found tons of discussion between BD and Indian players (especially from Kolkata). This is a sizable amount of interaction.
7) Please explain to me this phenomenon: i met several players whose names are Akash, Rohan and other indian names. When i ask them where they are from, they answer Bangladesh.
Now i am aware of other problems between India and Bangladesh such as:
1) BD players told me last time that india cheated in cricket and the national BD team was supposed to win.
2) Some BD players claim that India is taking too much resources from Bangladesh
3) Some indians told me they are more educated
conclusion, clearly, there are differences between these two countries. And the players from these countries do not want to be with each other not for compatibility reasons, but actually because of shared conflict and history.
Global is the first and one of the main place where people can get members, clans, troops (in req n go's or from helpers/dumpers), friends, answers for their question/discussing, chatting just for fun, wasting their time while clouding.Quote:
Originally Posted by darshan978
You must be new in the game but without globals COC would be anti-social(ish).
Please dont tell us how to play and what not to do, leave us the freedom of choice, stop complaining about complainers and rather play your own game/style.
First, those two countries were in the same global for 5 years. However, if they have sufficient player numbers to support their own global server, it might make sense. Only SC knows that. However, since I often see Indian players here compaining that the Indian server is too isolated and they want access to more countries, it seems a country next to them would be a good option to add. You disagree, which is fine, but it would seem to address a common request here: expanding the Indian server beyond just India.Quote:
Originally Posted by bhavyamamgain
This is a forum where we discuss many different topics. Just because there are people here who are not from those countries does not mean that they cannot discuss about them. We are free to post our suggestions here. Telling people what they can and cannot say in this forum is not what the forums is all about.Quote:
Originally Posted by bhavyamamgain
India as a country has many different languages and yet it functions well. You wanted (in your past posts) to have more diverse group of people (and therefore more foreign culture) in the global that you are in and yet you strongly oppose the addition of Bangladesh. The reasons you are putting forth to oppose the inclusion of Bangladesh in your global contradicts the same reason why you want India to be included in other global regions. Perhaps there is a more deep rooted reason why you are opposing Bangladesh.Quote:
Originally Posted by bhavyamamgain
My only complaint about them is that they continue to clog the english server with a foreign language. I look up their clan location and 90% of the time, its Bangladesh.
Give them their own language server, it'd be best for both sides.
That is just too logical isn't it?Quote:
Originally Posted by 2222
Youre kidding right?Quote:
Originally Posted by darshan978
So lets say SC moved BD to their own global or with Indians.... Then what?... Complain about another country and move them too? Why not just move every people who are not from us, canada, aus, uk and put only these 4 country as "Global" ?...... Global means international and every country have the right to be in it. If you keep removing countries from global then it's not global anymore. SC moved indians cause they had to.. Indians went too far for a long time and so SC had no choice but to make an exception for indians. And that made global better. So now the situation is dealt with and global is betrer, there's no real need to separate another country from global.
As I said earlier, most BD players are kids. In BD, most mature players don't even have a smart phone. Playing game is mostly considered only for kids in my country (Bangladesh) and sometimes you happen to be stumbled access them in global and you feel annoyed. What good can you expect from kids these days?
Global is divided based on the language you choose in the game. (English/Spanish/German, etc). Therefore, it is not okay in my perspective to see foreign languages in an English global.Quote:
Originally Posted by Nahid314
I would also agree with this. I think it would be interesting to see how far it has gone since being separated from the rest of English globals.Quote:
Originally Posted by Praveenkumar12