Attachment 18377
Attachment 18378
Idk if this is the Maggie on the forums though.
Printable View
Attachment 18377
Attachment 18378
Idk if this is the Maggie on the forums though.
Looks like it. Good luck :rolleyes:
It's Maggie, not the potato but the one with gemmed walls :rolleyes:
Princess potato doesn't gem.
Well thank you for admiring my walls but I'm sorry to inform you that I don't gem. Check out my profile. Since when did these so called farming clans start farming with dragons? I mean, my battle was a legitimate farm. You could've easily gotten my de with my same army composition. Good luck farming effectively with your army.
My my next free builder is in 5 days so I have to burn elexir: donate drags/drag attacks.
Your ur base is practically in breakable with a farming army and my dragloon attack only got the DE( I was hoping to 1 star you)
I made a profit with the DE and I'm sorry you don't approve of my methods :)
Why do people call out others they don't even know? Seems rude. Even if it weren't, not everyone in a top clan is a forum member.
Correction: gemmed-like walls :rolleyes:
Let's tone down the heat in here.
How about we all go enjoy ourselves at thequietplaceproject (look it up if you want to relax like really fast) and continue enjoying this Mano y Mano.
Good fight between each of you. I would not go up against Maggie's base with mass drags/balloons, but hey, to each his own.
IMO, this is just a plain revenge using 6 dragons, 16 baloons, and 3 rage spells. It's only even if you used normal farming armies, or Maggie used her full army. This is not Mano y Mano.
I do admit it is a bit unfair and quite a bad display of sportsmanship, if someone uses a fairly easy going farming army on you, it is common respect that in a mano a mano you reply with a similiar army, not a mass drag and bloon army.
Maybe TS doesn't know what Mano y Mano means?... :confused:
Sounds like a nobody attacked a somebody, and tries to rub it in their face. Did I get this right or what was the point of this thread?
She has a right to be "irritated." Mano y mano is basically going up against forumers with famring armies or similar compositions to the one that was used to "initiate the mano y mano." There was no need to post this, since she used a farming army and he used an overnight army. I highly doubt he farms with that army though; it is an overnight army or he probably has elixir to burn as he said. There was no need for her to criticize the method he used in the sarcastic manner she did, and there was also no need to say she was "hurt." Both comments were unnecessary and immature in my opinion.
Calling this a Mano y Mano is both hilarious and plain wrong. Firstly, the correct term is Mano a Mano, sometimes written as Mano-a-Mano. Secondly, in my opinion a Mano a Mano should either be a first strike where you offer the opponent the opportunity to revenge you with a similar army, or it should be a revenge where you strike back at the opponent with a similar army. In this case you revenged Maggie with a vastly superior army, supposedly build overnight. Nothing wrong with a plain revenge, but don't call it a Mano a Mano, and definitely don't call it a Mano y Mano.
Luckily we now have the profile function to seperate the men from the boys and the farmers from the gemmers. To each their own.
I do think its kinda unfair for a th 8 against a maxed th 9 with walls that looks gemmed :rolleyes:
C'mon guys, there's a 50 level difference! That's like my attacking my nooby premie th 7 alt
forum maggie is level 125
Guys I'm not "Forum Maggie". Please stop with the confusing the two. Gets pretty irritating. I'm just Maggie...
Despite being a forumer, I treated this like another revenge(attack with an army trained overnight)
2k DE was not something I was going to pass up just because I'm attacking a forumer.
However... In any chance of a Mano y Mano presents itself, I'll respect the traditions.
No hard feelings?