Would you like a No-dip bonus in wars?

Hi,
I don't know if it has already been suggested, but I think would be cool if SC add a no-dip bonus for each attack in war.
-I would add an other dimension to the global strategy of the clan, for example, would it be better for a TH10 to try a 2 star on a TH11, or trying to 3-star a TH10 to get also the bonus(maybe 0.5star).

-It would also help to "fight" against engineering, as each defenseless(or low defense) TH11 will give 0.5 more star for the opponent. A TH10 without inferno will also give an advantage to the opposite clan, as it is more easy to 3 star by a TH10.

-And maybe we will see more TH11 vs Th11 attacks and TH10 vs TH10 in CWL, and it will give us a better status on the current balancing.

What do you think about it?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Funktastic

Hi,
I don't know if it has already been suggested, but I think would be cool if SC add a no-dip bonus for each attack in war.
-I would add an other dimension to the global strategy of the clan, for example, would it be better for a TH10 to try a 2 star on a TH11, or trying to 3-star a TH10 to get also the bonus(maybe 0.5star).

-It would also help to "fight" against engineering, as each defenseless(or low defense) TH11 will give 0.5 more star for the opponent. A TH10 without inferno will also give an advantage to the opposite clan, as it is more easy to 3 star by a TH10.

-And maybe we will see more TH11 vs Th11 attacks and TH10 vs TH10 in CWL, and it will give us a better status on the current balancing.

What do you think about it?

---

Not a bad idea, but I would prefer a 0.5 star penalty for dipping.

PS. stop posting or you will lose 'crab claw' as a title, I always liked that one.

Sounds like you want to change wars from a coordinated team effort to a team of individuals duking it out lane v lane, just to "fix" engineering.

then we wont add new th players. easy 0.5 to the enemy

I'd rather make back the de I use in my army. I'm using around 4kde an army getting back less than 2.5k ... and thats if we win.

Why not have it make that back plus a wee bit ....

I know war isn't for making it back in loads and it more for fun... but still

I think they can work along the line of "Most heroic attack" and "Most heroic defense" to do something about it...

No. Dipping down has always been a core strategy in wars and not something that should be discouraged. Duking it out basically "straight across" will result in too many two stars for lower bases (and a LOT of two stars from TH10 Vs TH10) when wars for basically all decent war clans is about the triples. If that means ten Vs nine or 11 Vs 10 then that's how it's gotta be done.

Want to have a TH10 going up against TH11 more often? Sure. But be prepared for those one stars.

Nope as much as I want to not get destroyed by th10s in war I would not like my stars to go down by any amount if someone attacks lower. What if I have 2 th10s vs 2 th10s? 2 attacks would be wasted if they were both 3 starred.

No....war is war and within the rules clans should be able to attack whoever they like without changes to star outcome.

War win bonus already reflects th level so if someone dips they expect to earn less (albeit war not about loot!).

Put it this way, in a real life war is a general expected to only attack targets that are equal to their offensive power or do they attack wherever they need to in order to win the war?

I never said that diiping should disappear, you will still be able to dip for a 3 star, it's still better than an equal battle 2 star, But I think TH10 vs TH10 should be rewarded more that a TH11 vs Th10.

2 star attack < 3 stars dip < 3 star no dip
So the core strategy in war is not reduced but increased with an other possibility.