Walls that do not require free builder's hut for their construction and improvement

Walls are the thing that takes more time and resources than anything else, I understand that changing the price can be a tough choice since many players have spent time and money to do so, modifying the values ​​means making it much easier for them to experience Game.


Why do they need a builder's hut if so much their construction and upgrading is immediate?


In any case even the decorations are constructed in an instant and are elements that require resources and space to establish them. So they can be considered as walls even if they have no usefulness except the decorative one for clarification.


Why decorations do not require builder's hut and walls?


It would be much better to do so, as the builders are all busy in boosting them to eliminate a few million elixir and gold, thus reducing the chance for many players to steal millions of resources over a period of three days .



Since many have not understood it, I would like to point out that this will not interfere with the clash of clans "economy" because:
1 - it is like putting 4/5 builders at work and using the last worker just to strengthen the walls,
2 - if the walls did not require builders , players would continue to accumulate resources because otherwise they can not boost the village, furthermore, it is not possible to strengthen the walls infinitely so sooner or later players must force resources to strengthen the village,
3 - There have been far more divergent changes that have not affected the economy: 5 times faster troop creation, accumulating an army in the camp, a town hall of 2 levels below yours steals a small booty.
4 -The clash economy does not change so easily, and if so, there are many middlemen to remedy .

I'm still very upset that a glass globe for elixir storage can be built by whacking it with a hammer.

Also, bowlers are too unrealistic. Where are they keeping all of those big rocks? Are their pockets portals into a quarry?

ahahaha. Sorry , im italian and have translated the builders whit bricklayers XD

This has come up before and was stomped down rather quickly. You gave the reason in your post. It give players a way to dump extra loot while all builders are busy. If everyone did this it would destroy the games economy. You would get low loot from raids because they dumped their surplus into walls. Builder management is an important part of the game. Lots of players, myself included, keep a builder free so we can upgrade walls when needed.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bigdome757

This has come up before and was stomped down rather quickly. You gave the reason in your post. It give players a way to dump extra loot while all builders are busy. If everyone did this it would destroy the games economy. You would get low loot from raids because they dumped their surplus into walls. Builder management is an important part of the game. Lots of players, myself included, keep a builder free so we can upgrade walls when needed.

---

This

It actually use to be that you didn't need a builder for walls when the game was first launched but it had to much of a negative impact on the in game economy

Yes I totally agree. We need our walls to be upgraded WITHOUT a free builder.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bigdome757

This has come up before and was stomped down rather quickly. You gave the reason in your post. It give players a way to dump extra loot while all builders are busy. If everyone did this it would destroy the games economy. You would get low loot from raids because they dumped their surplus into walls. Builder management is an important part of the game. Lots of players, myself included, keep a builder free so we can upgrade walls when needed.

---

what could be more wrong then that ?


The "economy" of the game is not affected by the upgrading of the walls, because each player needs to maintain the resources to improve the troops. As you said before, you are using 4 builders instead of 5, so you can take advantage of the latest builder for wall upgrading. The trick can still be used today, but you must have the discomfort to leave a free builder. I understand that you need to be sure of all the details before accepting a new idea, but criticizing a problem that does not exist is wrong.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Somethingnotalreadypicked

This

It actually use to be that you didn't need a builder for walls when the game was first launched but it had to much of a negative impact on the in game economy

---

absolutely wrong

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pingotumbo

what could be more wrong then that ?


The "economy" of the game is not affected by the upgrading of the walls, because each player needs to maintain the resources to improve the troops. As you said before, you are using 4 builders instead of 5, so you can take advantage of the latest builder for wall upgrading. The trick can still be used today, but you must have the discomfort to leave a free builder. I understand that you need to be sure of all the details before accepting a new idea, but criticizing a problem that does not exist is wrong.

---

Of course the economy is affected by walls. If all the people like yourself, who have troubles managing their time and resources in a game with such a large time and resource management component, were able to dump excess loot immediately into walls then there would be less raidable loot out there.

Builders are a resource, learn to manage them.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bigdome757

This has come up before and was stomped down rather quickly. You gave the reason in your post. It give players a way to dump extra loot while all builders are busy. If everyone did this it would destroy the games economy. You would get low loot from raids because they dumped their surplus into walls. Builder management is an important part of the game. Lots of players, myself included, keep a builder free so we can upgrade walls when needed.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pingotumbo

what could be more wrong then that ?


The "economy" of the game is not affected by the upgrading of the walls, because each player needs to maintain the resources to improve the troops. As you said before, you are using 4 builders instead of 5, so you can take advantage of the latest builder for wall upgrading. The trick can still be used today, but you must have the discomfort to leave a free builder. I understand that you need to be sure of all the details before accepting a new idea, but criticizing a problem that does not exist is wrong.

---

Your response is what's more wrong than that!