Why can't their be a goblin king too. It can charge at resources and destroy them in seconds? It'll be good for people who farm.
Printable View
Why can't their be a goblin king too. It can charge at resources and destroy them in seconds? It'll be good for people who farm.
It would be too much, goblins are good enough.
OMG wizard king, pekka king, goblin king??? We don't need these things implemented. You don't want your goblins to die quickly? Just place a rage and heal spell down. Archers queen and barbarian king are already good enough as a dynamic duo. I myself is a farmer and I just think the goblin king would be kinda dumb.
No more heros its enough now
Ok so a guy in my clan, who is town hall 10, said today that he wants another hero to spend his excess dark elixir on. He's sitting on a 100k de right now and he already has golems going to lvl 3. He hasn't gemmed any upgrades except for his army camps to lvl 8
there already is a goblin king in the game, he is a part of the intro
We've got Barbarian King and Archer Queen, that is good enough.
Two reasons it won`t happen:
Goblin King = Goblins village, so it will never happen that you will have a king of your enemy helping you...
Read the sticky, I think this idea is removed
Yep must agree with everybody goblin king there shouldn't be one
No more heroes for now!!!!!!!!!!!!! That would be extremely OP, and just think of the consequences if we had heroes for every troop... 10 maxed heroes will totally destroy your base without effort, and your weeny defences wont stand a single chance...
http://forum.supercell.net/showthrea...ighligt=heroes is the best idea in my opinion.