Not going to war is not a solution Porky.
How about you give us a legitimate solution? I say it is difficult to recruit reliable players. How do you do it?
Printable View
Not going to war is not a solution Porky.
How about you give us a legitimate solution? I say it is difficult to recruit reliable players. How do you do it?
When the account is like the one I posted their sole intention was to game the system. I addressed it exactly how it needed to be. Those types of account have no place in a war.Quote:
Originally Posted by LittleMoon
These are all silly excuses. Yes you can 3 star it and you would 3 star th TH7 at the bottom but it weakens the clan weight to decrease competition at the top. All the rest are transparent excuses to try to get an unfair advantage. I guess I just don't understand why people would want to try to rig a game with no financial payoff. Kinda cheapens the win but I guess winning is the only thing that matters in today's society no matter if you maintain your morals or not.
Whoa dont blame or punish the newbies lol its the matchmaking that needs fixing. It can be also avoided with a well balanced lineup of your ownQuote:
Originally Posted by xXXCHRISXXx
Porky, What you are proposing would effectively prevent any new clan from being formed.
You get 10 players in a new clan for a war then lose a couple after the first war and maybe each war after. If you wait to long between wars your members are going to leave because they want to war.
You clearly do not know what you are talking about. There are several reasons for roster engineering. What if you have 11 or 16 people opted in? I would rather fill 4 spots with inactive accounts than have to sit someone out. I am not kidding anybody, I assure you. Now, when I'm selecting 4 inactive bases to fill those war spots, who do you think I'm going to choose?Quote:
Originally Posted by DavePorky
There are so many clans out there that are roster engineering, it is rare to even gain a significant advantage anyways. For the most part, in my experience at least, roster engineering is far more likely to simply prevent you from being at a disadvantage.
Milo, I agree. If you sit people out, they leave!
If it were truly a noob as you suggest they would've built more. However I do agree the match maker needs attention. Our bottom is a th7 just to satisfy your curiosity.Quote:
Originally Posted by Redviper42
I have had mixed results with roster engineering (extreme versions) so i stick to a lighter version of it.
IMO roster engineered clans (heavy ones) aren't that consistent... one moment they have an advantage, another they are at a big disadvantage.
If its really common to your clan, maybe try adding a few of our own. You should get matched with similiar clans :)
I agree with the fellow who said this doesn't work as well as it used to. We used to have 3 low guys, not our accounts, but 3 inactives we pulled off global months ago, that were were putting in to make 15 members. We were getting matcvhes with similar clans who had many lows and a couple good highs. Wars really come down to how tough base #1 was and that usualy was based on who had the most low bases.
We since dropped the 3 TH3/4s and we only war with TH9-7 now. We have since then not gotten put against those clans that were padding the bottom. There seems to be something in the matchmaker that is comparing the top and bottom and matching them to each other in my opinion.
So if your running into this... even out your lineup.