This can solve Engineering

I like this idea, it seems clear to me that the only people that won't like it, are the engineers 😂

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Matthebarbarian

I like this idea, it seems clear to me that the only people that won't like it, are the engineers 😂

---

Or those that are at a new at a th level. Or rushed accounts. The only ones who like the idea are maxers.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MrJackrabbit

Or those that are at a new at a th level. Or rushed accounts. The only ones who like the idea are maxers.

---

Those that are rushed - are getting less and less as people are realising that it's the worst way to upgrade, it recommends u don't in the game guide and FAQ's so it's their own fault, and they then Rush thier troops to balence out. The bulk of fair play players upgrade in the correct way.

Those that are new to a TH level. - well that will be right won't it? There weighted at the previous th level. I don't see a problem.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Matthebarbarian

I like this idea, it seems clear to me that the only people that won't like it, are the engineers 😂

---

Then your vision is flawed. Weighting a building that adds absolutely nothing to either the offensive or defensive strength of a base has been suggested many times and it is not only engineers who think it is a bad idea.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Matthebarbarian

Those that are rushed - are getting less and less as people are realising that it's the worst way to upgrade, it recommends u don't in the game guide and FAQ's so it's their own fault, and they then Rush thier troops to balence out. The bulk of fair play players upgrade in the correct way.

Those that are new to a TH level. - well that will be right won't it? There weighted at the previous th level. I don't see a problem.

---

You have no way of knowing the proportion of rushed players, nor whether it is decreasing as you assert, increasing or remaining the same. Try thinking of all players and not just those who play in a way that you approve of.

I'm curious why you mentioned fair play - are you implying that engineering is unfair play? If so, you'd be as wrong about that as you are when you state that there is a correct way to upgrade.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by prosper12

We definitely need a calculation like this. If they moved to the next Th, the actual TH should be counted in the war weight as a large weight. I would add more weight on troops.

If this can't be done it should be a heavier emphasis on troops rather than defence for calculating war weight.

---

Moving to the next th level opens up more upgrades for troops and spells and troops availed for unlocking in the barracks so factoring this all in would help in making more fair MM.

Right now matchmaking still still being worked around by engineered bases. And we still need this addressed by SC.

What do you have against engineering I'm not an engineer but engineering adds a certain depth and variety to the game. What's the point if you have to attack and defend against the same kind of people all the time

In my opinion and others engineered bases are unfair when you consider that the war weight matchmaking is being manipulated for the clans they are in get a unfair advantage in war.

I support fair play. Engineered bases do not.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by lonewolf1234

In my opinion and others engineered bases are unfair when you consider that the war weight matchmaking is being manipulated for the clans they are in get a unfair advantage in war.

I support fair play. Engineered bases do not.

---

If you supported fair play you wouldn't call for those playing within the rules to be banned.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Aspex

Then your vision is flawed. Weighting a building that adds absolutely nothing to either the offensive or defensive strength of a base has been suggested many times and it is not only engineers who think it is a bad idea.



You have no way of knowing the proportion of rushed players, nor whether it is decreasing as you assert, increasing or remaining the same. Try thinking of all players and not just those who play in a way that you approve of.

I'm curious why you mentioned fair play - are you implying that engineering is unfair play? If so, you'd be as wrong about that as you are when you state that there is a correct way to upgrade.

---

I am basing a lot of it on my opinion added on what I see in the game (which I spend way to much time on) and read in forums different articles etc, which doesn't make me right or wrong As u suggest. That is just ur opinion, right or wrong.

And yes, I am implying that engineered bases are not fair play. In my opinion and a LOT of other opinions. They are bending the rules to gain an unfair advantage.

Eg, I have been in several wars where we're up against max hero's max warden and max minors/bowlers. When our top base is a half decent TH10. I don't care what u say! That is not sportsman like or fair play

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Matthebarbarian

I am basing a lot of it on my opinion added on what I see in the game (which I spend way to much time on) and read in forums different articles etc, which doesn't make me right or wrong As u suggest. That is just ur opinion, right or wrong.

And yes, I am implying that engineered bases are not fair play. In my opinion and a LOT of other opinions. They are bending the rules to gain an unfair advantage.

Eg, I have been in several wars where we're up against max hero's max warden and max minors/bowlers. When our top base is a half decent TH10. I don't care what u say! That is not sportsman like or fair play

---

Nowhere in the posts that I responded to did you say that those were your opinions.

You do realise that the strength of the offence of that one base will mean a corresponding decrease in the strength of the offence of all the other bases within its lineup? Just because a clan has their offensive and defensive strength distributed differently to yours does not mean that it is unfair, an advantage or both.

Further, fair play within CoC has a specific meaning relating to TPA usage. Engineering does not contravene that.