Message is simple... there is a minuscule difference between a 50% 2 star and a 99% 2 star. That is insane. A 5 star system would help a lot. Thoughts?
Printable View
Message is simple... there is a minuscule difference between a 50% 2 star and a 99% 2 star. That is insane. A 5 star system would help a lot. Thoughts?
Wouldn't it just be more simple to remove the star system and just go by %?
Hah... yes it would. I have no argument to this idea, well said!Quote:
Originally Posted by JKL2207
There is a difference between 50% 2 star and 99% 2 star ... more destruction in the latter case, which can decide a close war.
/Affront
Gold star for catching technicality... has no bearing on point of thread though. 5 star system would drastically improve overall system.Quote:
Originally Posted by Affront
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stridefizzel
Not really, then we will be wanting something to differentiate a 75% 4 star and 99% 4 star.
That would eliminate ring bases. Not that it would be a bad thing :pQuote:
Originally Posted by JKL2207
Here you go: https://forum.supercell.com/showthre...me-dynamics%29
It's a thread from 23rd February 2015, the main post regardning a revision of the star system, found in the Ideas & Req. listings of common ideas that are not ruled out.
You really don't see a difference? So if you're in war, and you pull a 3 star 90% war attack in a 5 star system (assume TH missed, as well as 100% destruction), you'd say that is no different from a 1 star 90% war attack in a 3 star system (assume TH missed... obviously... as well as 100% destruction)?Quote:
Originally Posted by JKL2207
60% efficiency vs 33% efficiency is an improvement in my book.
There is a difference between a low 2 star and a high 2 star and Affront has pointed it out. It has bearing on this thread especially if the point of view is from the 5 stars would not be better side.
A fair point Monoxide (and Affront), technically my original language did specify 'no difference'. Thanks for pointing this out, I have altered original language to better reflect issue.Quote:
Originally Posted by Monoxide
However, 5 stars would still improve on many issues as has been discussed briefly above
Thanks Cayumi. A much better thread than mine indeed. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Cayumi
This is actually a more simple way than having a 5 star system.Quote:
Originally Posted by JKL2207
I'm completely on board with this, I have been for ages. People keep making these long and complicated ideas about multiple star systems, but at the end of the day it really isn't necessary imo. Keep it purely on % of destruction. Sure, the TH would be nothing more than a HP buffer, but you will actually see original base designs again, not just 95% ring and moat designs.Quote:
Originally Posted by JKL2207
Why stop at 5 let's have 7 star system and bypass the next few years of 5 stars system doesn't work, should be a 7 star system!
That would lead to more spam atacks. The TH star is something that you need to aim and have some sort of control to path your troops. However, I like the 5 star system used in another similar game.Quote:
Originally Posted by JKL2207
Increasing the number of stars available will not resolve many issues. It may swing the results in a few instances but it really it will go both ways, so where is the improvement ?
Counting percentage only will dramatically change base designs and make higher percentage attacks even more difficult. If I don't need to protect a high hp 4x4 then I can defend the little stuff even better.
It would also undermine SC's stance on the importance of th in multiplayer.
There are a number of games that use seemingingly disparate scoring systems. Have you ever considered the scoring anomolies that exist in tennis, most non-round ball sports or ten-pin bowling ?
Not really ... it would just move your gripe with the system a bit..Quote:
Originally Posted by Stridefizzel
As it is .. 50% gets a star, TH gets a star, 100% gets a star
Let's assume that we have a 5 star system, so 25%, 50%, 75% 100% and TH each give a star?
Damage % or total number of building hit points destroyed would be the most fine grained way to measure an attack. (effectively making it a 100 star system, if you will..)
/Affront
A fourth star for 75% at TH10+ might be good.
I totally agree, there must be this differentiation, it would be the best idea that supercell would make in this update.
Eu concordo totalmente, deve haver essa diferenciação, seria a melhor ideia que supercell faria nesta atualização.
A system based purely on % neglects the town hall completely. Not only that, we no longer have a clear line on what counts as a successful attack or defense.
My idea of a 5 star system gives a star for TH, 40, 60, 80 and 100%. I'm also inclined to say that a battle isn't won unless you earn two stars. This makes defending a bit easier, as well as rewarding better attacks.
101 star system
1 star for TH and one star for every %
A battle is "won" at 2 stars? So 20% and a TH or 40% is a win?Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiler
Sheesh - pretty generous
Grossly undervalues th. No different from percentage only from a design perspective.Quote:
Originally Posted by PhilISuppose
Everyone wanting a change seems to ignore the most critical issue. The enemy clan scores stars in EXACTLY the same way. This is why percentage damage was introduced as a tie-breaker.
<Sarcasm>Yeah you totally got where I was going with that post </Sarcasm>Quote:
Originally Posted by OzAudi
Hint:
This post is also sarcasm
The system is fine
Fair callQuote:
Originally Posted by PhilISuppose
.
.
.
.
.
but in my defense I have read simplistic but serious posts in this thread already.
Yeah, good reading, Chief. Battles would be won at either 60%, or at 40% with the TH, according to my first post. If you're going to be condescending, at least try to use what I actually said against me.Quote:
Originally Posted by PhilISuppose
Though I'll admit the system doesn't really need an overhaul like this. I just like the idea of 5 stars instead of 3. I'm a numbers guy. The more, the merrier, haha
good, now i can get 10 stars every war with my th3, for the war hero gems
I'm a numbers guy too. Ordinal systems rarely scale numerically without changing intent.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiler