Message is simple... there is a minuscule difference between a 50% 2 star and a 99% 2 star. That is insane. A 5 star system would help a lot. Thoughts?
Printable View
Message is simple... there is a minuscule difference between a 50% 2 star and a 99% 2 star. That is insane. A 5 star system would help a lot. Thoughts?
Wouldn't it just be more simple to remove the star system and just go by %?
Hah... yes it would. I have no argument to this idea, well said!Quote:
Originally Posted by JKL2207
There is a difference between 50% 2 star and 99% 2 star ... more destruction in the latter case, which can decide a close war.
/Affront
Gold star for catching technicality... has no bearing on point of thread though. 5 star system would drastically improve overall system.Quote:
Originally Posted by Affront
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stridefizzel
Not really, then we will be wanting something to differentiate a 75% 4 star and 99% 4 star.
That would eliminate ring bases. Not that it would be a bad thing :pQuote:
Originally Posted by JKL2207
Here you go: https://forum.supercell.com/showthre...me-dynamics%29
It's a thread from 23rd February 2015, the main post regardning a revision of the star system, found in the Ideas & Req. listings of common ideas that are not ruled out.
You really don't see a difference? So if you're in war, and you pull a 3 star 90% war attack in a 5 star system (assume TH missed, as well as 100% destruction), you'd say that is no different from a 1 star 90% war attack in a 3 star system (assume TH missed... obviously... as well as 100% destruction)?Quote:
Originally Posted by JKL2207
60% efficiency vs 33% efficiency is an improvement in my book.
There is a difference between a low 2 star and a high 2 star and Affront has pointed it out. It has bearing on this thread especially if the point of view is from the 5 stars would not be better side.