There should be a surrender button that only the Clan Leader can use during a war. Sometimes the war is over and all attacks are used but you still have to wait 12 hrs for the war to still "end".
Printable View
There should be a surrender button that only the Clan Leader can use during a war. Sometimes the war is over and all attacks are used but you still have to wait 12 hrs for the war to still "end".
I assume you want to end the war early in order to start another immediately? If so, read on...
You need to understand that SC is giving us FREE loot from wars. By limiting a clan to only participate in one war per 47 hours at most, they are controlling how much free lot potentially gets injected into the economy. Therefore, if they were to implement a surrender function, then clans could be warring every 36 hours. Another common suggestion is to shorten prep days or have clans click a "ready" button that ends prep day sooner. In any case, these features would/could affect the economy and SC has to consider the big picture before implementing such ideas that seem easy or obvious to players.
Another thing to consider - how many clans would actually benefit from this feature? For one thing, you wouldn't want to surrender before all attacks are used. People may still want to attack for loot, stars toward their achievement, clan XP, practice, etc. I don't think I have ever been in a war where both clans used all their attacks with 12 hours still remaining in the war. Therefore, I have to imagine that the applicability of this feature is not going to be widespread. Why should SC use precious developer time to implement a feature that only a very small % of clans will be able to use?
Good point, was just a suggestion. We have had it before also where they 3* our top 4 and we were able to 2* their top 2 bases knowing war was over. Feeling was unfairly matched (but still trying because that is what we do) we knew we had no chance. We were talking in our chat, "man I wish we could just say good game and surrender". It was just an idea.
It's not a terrible idea but the reasons presented against it are very sound.
Losing in a mismatched war sucks but make a positive out of it. Get all the XP possible and then encourage members practice if they have been struggling lately or try a new strat or just cut loose and have some fun with some random attack.
I disagree ending a War sooner would affect loot economy in a way that makes any difference. We have league bonus, loot cart, daily bonus, abandoned villages... War bonus is just a small fraction Of the "free" loot we already get.
nevertheless, as already stated, all members should have an oportunity to attack. I don't see any reason for the War not to end after all attacks are used from both clans though.
Well, maybe if some elders and co's got to vote in the matter as well, and a surrender would give a ten percent loot bonus from bases.
Member = 1
Elders = 2 vote
Co = 3 Vote
Leader = 5 Vote
This could anger people in the clan who wanted to finish the war.
In order to make sure team gets all attacks in they want for loot, make an accept button on surrender.
Would be a good idea, but it had to be a choice of at least 50% of the clan mates in war, not only the leaders.
And wars are not FREE LOOT, since you have to spend a lot on the army comp, and when you lose a war u even lose loot!