Printable View
SC jusr needs to balance the game better. Much fewer people were complaining about the game before the update and crushing nerf to offence. They just needed to buff the troops that weren't being used, not hurt the ones that were.
Sure the other add on would be nice to see, but they need to fix the basic game first.
Everything he said about friendly challenges Ive been saying since day 1... Methinks SC just wants people to gem troops for FC's so they will never improve the feature
Very interesting, OP. I like your ideas!
For c (loss of certain amount of resources generates a shield), I would modify that--instead of loot loss it should be percentage of attacking troops deployed. It should end with the same result (i.e. shield for good defense or loss of loot from collector raiding).
Quote:
Originally Posted by JonnyVW
I think you are forgetting that the artillery activates after 180 troop space has been deployed. Also, in Clashcon 2015 Jonas stated that what the developers would like to see in TH11 was multi-phase attacks. Well, we all know that the current state of the game promotes spam attacks in TH11, not multi-phase attacks. If my proposal gets implemented, this is fixed immediately: use up to 180 troop space in your first phase of the attack to take down the bird... or else the attack is over!Quote:
Originally Posted by Zelonius
I think you have ideas to rework some of the gameplay, but what the game really needs is something new. Clanwars was a completely new feature that made me want to play this game. Ash has some good ideas on new modes for users to enjoy. I would like to see SC work on something game changing like this.
The clash between troops and defenses is an amazing format we all love. But right now the only format you get to play it in is build a base for defense, and build an army to attack those bases. But this is only one option. Mini games or challenges using our same troops to attack something different than full user bases is what this game needs.(new types of goblin map challenges, timed challenges, raid bosses, dungeons or expeditions, daily quests) Multiple people being able to team up and attack something at the same time would be incredible.
If SC can develop this type of content and re-imagine the entire game while offering new stats or badges or rewards, this game could be re-energized. If the future brings nothing more than TH12 with new levels to the same old content and questionable balancing, this game is in trouble.
no no no no no no no....why dont you learn how to raid properlyQuote:
Originally Posted by kdrakakis
Well, I guess there will always be someone eager to insult, right? For your information, I am in Champion 3 so, yes, I know how to raid. But I am also committed to a simple and engaging gameplay, as I said.
and exactly how's that supposed to be done? no matter how skilled you are, you cannot take down the eagle unless you use the damage dealers. but by putting 3x damage on the damagers, you are actually making sure of their instant death. most high dps troops don't have the hp needed to survive a 3x hit from the eagle, and without using such troops, there is no way you can take out a core defense like the EA.Quote:
Originally Posted by kdrakakis
you say that this will inspire multi-phase attacks. but actually you're very wrong. let's take GoHo for example. like you ask for the EA to be taken down, GoHo aims to trigger DGBs. but you cannot expect this to work out unless you use wizards. imagine a player trying to make a kill squad out of only tankers like the golem. actually your proposal is quite similar, except it's for th11
OK, let's take a step back, I think you completely misunderstood what I am saying. First of all, the 3x damage will be gone. As I said, there should be no special cases and no exceptions. So, using up to 180 troop space, before the artillery activates, the goal will be to take it down. In other words, the goal of the multi-phase attack will be to take the artillery down without firing a single shot.Quote:
Originally Posted by jackpot55
a) If we can build two armies, let's actually make use of all the extra troops. Yes, now in TH10 I can train a total of 480 troop space and 22 spell space, yet the second half of each is just there ready to be donated away or ready to be used after the first half has been already used in a raid. But why not be able to use it all? So, when I go for my farming raid, I should have all 480 troops and 22 spells at my disposal, although I should be able to only deploy 240 and 11 of those, respectively, whichever I choose, and no more. Raids would become much more interesting if we had a wider pool of troops to choose from!
Don't agree, unless they change the attacking interface... A lot Of troops to choose from is just confusing when you want to drop your army as soon as possible. However, you could have two options of armies to choose before you attack. You choose a composition, then stay with that for the whole attack (air or ground, for instance)
b) Let's remove all TH level restrictions that currently apply in matchmaking. To appreciate how absurd the current system is, consider two facts: a) as a TH10, for example, raiding a TH6 would be a really bad idea, because a loot multiplier of 5% would apply, meaning that only a tiny bit of resources could possibly be stolen. Of course this is all academic, as b) the probability that a TH10 will be matched to a TH6 for a raid is virtually 0. So, what is the need of the multiplier in the first place? My recommendation is to allow free matchmaking based on trophies, ignoring TH levels. And yes, I foresee an uproar here by lower level bases, genuinely concerned they will fall prey to higher levels, but there is no cause for concern. Firstly, they will reap the benefits of this change themselves, once they level up. Secondly, after they get 3-starred by a much higher level base, they will get 16 hours of shield, during which they can raid multiple times and make much more than what they lost. So there is no
Game should be challenging... Easily getting loot from lower THs is not fun at all
c) Award shield using the current criteria, but also according to lost loot. For example, imagine my shield/guard ends and I need to take a defense, and imagine that I get hit by several failed attacks, all under 30%: I currently get a guard (or a shield?) according to the "mercy rule" or whatever it is called, but there is no limit to the loot I can lose. So let's bring in a new rule that will say that, for TH10, for example, a shield will be awarded once I have lost more than 1500DE or 300K elixir or 300K gold cumulatively since my last guard ended. So now I can sleep in peace knowing that, even if I get hit by multiple failed attacks that will give me no shield, I can only lose so much loot before I get a shield.
you should spread your storages, so people should destroy more than 30% to steal them. Dark elixir should be in the core if you don't wanna lose it.
d) Once c) gets implemented, remove special cases regarding lightning. Yes, bring back the old DE zapping! Why not? Where is the harm? Sure, I expect I will be getting zapped all the time, but, once I lose more than 1500DE, as mentioned above, I will get my shield! The problem with lighting and earthquake not damaging storages is that there are side effects in war. This is what happened to me a while ago during a war: I had almost 3-starred a base, when my last troops died to a giant bomb with only one last building left, which was already severely damaged. Fortunately, I had an earthquake with me (some people take two poisons with them, I take a poison and an earthquake as an emergency, mostly to use on a TH that may be standing with a sliver of health): so I dropped my earthquake, but alas the building was a storage ---> 99% 2 star. Yes, this is not what the developers had in
Protecting resources against zapping is one Of the best thing they done into the game. Imagine how hard it can be maxing your heroes if people zap your storages every time.
e) Eagle artillery does 3x damage to golems, but not other troops or even other tanks (like giants or lava hound). So, remove this multiplier, but change the mechanics of the artillery: let it now target the highest concentration of DPS rather than hitpoints. So, it should not target the golem, but the clumped bowlers or wizards behind it. Now, this would make gameplay interesting!
that is the only thing I would consider... I miss using golems in TH11