Better punishments for those that leave during clan wars

Leaders do need a punishment for adding random people without proper screening :)

They are barely even in the clan less than 24 hours but want to war.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Thedudethatlikesyou

It's not really their fault that they left, they might have had to leave the clan for a very good reason!

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Frost86

They are barely even in the clan less than 24 hours but want to war.

---

Do you also give them co and elder because they want it?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Aspex

Make new members sit out at least their first war, that way you weed out most who'd be liable to hop. In addition, only put new members in if you can cover their attacks should they leave. My clan does both of these and i cannot remember the last time someone left during war. Warring at 30v30 with 10+ new members is a recipe for disaster.

In short, don't ask for the game to be changed to address poor clan management.

---

I run a good clan, i would also like a feature to punish loot and runners. Dont insult the poster saying he has poor clan management, its not necessary.

just so unecessary, first paragraph was fine just self/egocentric, his clan is not in a strong position like yours. Second paragraph/sentence, in short was just to step on him. No purpose but to make him feel small and insult him.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sheedy17

so you, or the leader of your clan cannot manage your clan , so you want supercell to step in and punish all these people.....

A better idea is get better leadership or someone who knows what they are doing, do 20 on 20 wars or 25/25 if the people can't be trusted, don't come crying to supercell, its not their problem

---

actually he is perfectly entitiled to up his view forward, designing a game that is user friendly isnt their problem, its their job. Whether this feature should be installerad or not of course depends on costs and demand. The ability to punished is a tool of leadership, he is asking for and extra tool.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Vikingchief

I run a good clan, i would also like a feature to punish loot and runners. Dont insult the poster saying he has poor clan management, its not necessary.

---

I did not say that the poster had poor clan management, I said that their clan has it. I was not the only poster to say that and yet it's me that you attempt to upbraid about it. I wonder why?

If they are warring at 30 vs. 30 with 1/3+ of their lineup being new members, what would you call it?

I won't comment on what sort of "good clan" wishes to punish those who leave them.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Aspex

I did not say that the poster had poor clan management, I said that their clan has it. I was not the only poster to say that and yet it's me that you attempt to upbraid about it. I wonder why?

If they are warring at 30 vs. 30 with 1/3+ of their lineup being new members, what would you call it?

I won't comment on what sort of "good clan" wishes to punish those who leave them.

---

if someone 1 star loots both attacks I should be able to clan back his loot bonus, he used the clan and looted of our backs.

Aspez I try my best not to correspond with you, but you have a High post count, are well know, and people often copy you after you go hard at a poster. You carry weight that they dont. I dont think your a bad guy, you help people with bug fixes, and 90% of the time add a lot of value, but then 5 % of the time you are unecessarily terse with usually newish members. I dont understand why you feel the need to dominat these guys. So to answer the question its because you are not the normal troll who goes around needling people 100% of time, so you are worth talking to and 2nd you are a behavior guide to others, which makes how you behave more significant.

the guy is in a weak recruiting situation, sometimes you have to have faith in people, if they abandaned you you should have recourse.

Look, here is what we do in my clan: Anyone new who joins, they can't be in our wars for the first 3 days. After the 3 days are over, we ask them if they would like to be in war. If they say yes, we explain the rules of how we war in our clan. If they break the rules, more importantly, leave during a clan war, then we write there name on a clan blacklist. (Just an FYI, my clans blacklist has about 20 or so members on it)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by smokenbooze1

Leaders do need a punishment for adding random people without proper screening :)

---

^^^^
This.

It's all well and good to say "don't blame the OP", but the reality is, this topic crops up several times a week. If more people spent energy of searching instead of ranting and writing/typing, they would find all sorts of useful tips. We ALL have started beginner clans, some of us have run several. We mostly coped with the pitfalls and we know what works and doesn't work. This forum is as much about seeking advice as blaming and begging SC. Advice is what makes ANY forum worthwhile.

OP, advanced search the forum. Punishment and other techniques have been discussed to death. There are numerous threads with useful advice. Most of them start with Leadership (you and your co). We can help you. SC can't and won't. But first you need to help yourself.

I read all the above comments, I agree it can be fixed by better leadership. But a lot of people don't want to wait the days for the new to go away or to wait at all. So they just leave, that is one con of the current sit.

But I think SC should just let a clan cancel a war if a certain amount of people leave that were in war. (of course this should only be allowed before battleday to prevent abuse)

Because even people who have been in clans for a long time have left during wars, and then u have an unfair war and then bad stats for an unlucky clan, and a lot of people look at stats when searching for a clan. Of course refund the troops spent in war cc's in full. Can we be proud of winning an unfair war?