ACCEPT OR REJECT WAR BOTTON or SURRENDER BUTTON.

I have come up with this idea... We all agree that there are mismatching in clan wars... when your top players get to mirror higher th levels? Or up against engineered bases?

How about if you will be given TIME to either to click ACCEPT/REJECT or NEXT BUTTON .. you only have a few seconds or minutes to check out your opponents... then click accept if you are ok to war against them or reject/next if not. Just like in the multi where you can click next. Of course the downside is you need to wait til a possible match comes up like in the multi player.

Another 1 is a Surrender Button. If you click surrender, it shall be put in the warlog that you lost by surrender or something like that Sometimes you know you are gonna lose by seeing your opponents... so why wait for 47hours to search for another war if you have a surrender button right?

CLASH ON! :)

I think you're missing the point of war. If you want to next past every challenge you meet in the game, you can raid. If you want to step up to the plate and take on a challenge, you can war. I can't imagine anything worse than having clans stuck in an endless loop of searching and failing as clan after clan after clan nexts by looking for an easy war based on limited info.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SharkyFinn

I think you're missing the point of war. If you want to next past every challenge you meet in the game, you can raid. If you want to step up to the plate and take on a challenge, you can war. I can't imagine anything worse than having clans stuck in an endless loop of searching and failing as clan after clan after clan nexts by looking for an easy war based on limited info.

---

Yeah true but im tired losing to a mismatched war... id rather surrender... :) ty for your comment :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by lllbenjolll

Yeah true but im tired losing to a mismatched war... id rather surrender... :) ty for your comment :)

---

join a fwa clan if you want easy wars...♥♥♥♥..
you can only improve if you challenge yourself

My war clan is full maxed th11s so we hv never encountered engineers before, but I know how it feels when playing against engineered bases. Its as suck as playing against clans with burner accounts, same outcome: you LOSE. Sadly, those engineer bases help spc bank account look like distance to moon in mm, so we probably wont see any changes.

I'm thinking that you do not have a very good clan and you are complaining about it. There are several threads by you complaining about non existent problems.

I know the feeling, we're about to have our best-ever streak snapped at 17 due to an absolutely horrible match. Thanks SC. 10v10 how do you match a max th11 (40/40/20 heroes) with a clan that doesn't have a th11 or even 10.5? With additional advantages farther down the roster.

But if there was a skip/surrender button, our last 17 opponents would see our log and quit. That's just not workable, we just need to wait for SC to fix matchmaking though I'm concerned they won't. Seemed to work well post December, they changed it for no good reason that I know of back in March opening up the 'lopsided loophole'. And they've left it open so long, lopsided accounts are everywhere now. War forum used to be about strategy, now its all engineering complaints, nothing else.

But... game is old news now. Not many new players. If they've determined that lopsided gemmers are their best source of revenue now, that would explain the foot-dragging on rolling back the March change.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by lllbenjolll

Yeah true but im tired losing to a mismatched war... id rather surrender... :) ty for your comment :)

---

Then you will never war at all. The moment you found a match acceptable to your clan...the other clan would surrender. Thus, starting the search all over again.

If you are constantly getting perceived mismatches in war- might want to take a closer look at your mates and how you approach wars. The new Friendly War feature may end up being your best avenue for war play.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TankSinatra

I know the feeling, we're about to have our best-ever streak snapped at 17 due to an absolutely horrible match. Thanks SC. 10v10 how do you match a max th11 (40/40/20 heroes) with a clan that doesn't have a th11 or even 10.5? With additional advantages farther down the roster.

But if there was a skip/surrender button, our last 17 opponents would see our log and quit. That's just not workable, we just need to wait for SC to fix matchmaking though I'm concerned they won't. Seemed to work well post December, they changed it for no good reason that I know of back in March opening up the 'lopsided loophole'. And they've left it open so long, lopsided accounts are everywhere now. War forum used to be about strategy, now its all engineering complaints, nothing else.

But... game is old news now. Not many new players. If they've determined that lopsided gemmers are their best source of revenue now, that would explain the foot-dragging on rolling back the March change.

---

After winning that many in a row, your "recent war record" penalty gets pretty high. You earned that mismatch fair and square I'd say, no reason to get upset about it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MossackFonseca

After winning that many in a row, your "recent war record" penalty gets pretty high. You earned that mismatch fair and square I'd say, no reason to get upset about it.

---

I don't think so. The system tries (with limited success) to match winning clans vs winning clans, there's no weight penalty. If there is, I'd like to know how opponent - new clan, record 11-0-0, got such a favorable match.

Nice name btw.

Well the best clan is always going to exept and the badder clan is always going to reject intakt way we never get to war.