I find it more useful to use rage instead of freeze. Freeze might actually need a buff to counteract the inferno buffs. Maybe add 1 second to lv1 and another 0.25 seconds per level (level 5 would last for 10 seconds )
Printable View
I find it more useful to use rage instead of freeze. Freeze might actually need a buff to counteract the inferno buffs. Maybe add 1 second to lv1 and another 0.25 seconds per level (level 5 would last for 10 seconds )
Agreed.
Add additional characters to meet 10 character minimum.
Freeze is more useful against single target infernos once they get a lock on something important. It's also more helpful to freeze if the troops it's frying are busy with something else, though it's hard to anticipate a situation like that when planning. I believe Freeze is an underused spell, however. Either an extension on time, or an increase in radius to grab an extra xbow, eagle or whatever. Either would be helpful
Currently a lower level freeze is about as good a a lower level jump spell, both are very difficult to use at a low level. So to actually use either of them it takes over a month to upgrade them to a level in which they are useful. They could use a buff or something. Otherwise they will just sit on the back burner until ppl get done upgrading their more important troops and spells.
thanks for the supportQuote:
Originally Posted by Willyking
I will go with freeze as it freezes everything in its range like if there are xbows or teslas along with the inferno they can be easily taken down!
How often do you attack th10s with active infernos?Quote:
Originally Posted by Galvatron100
Agreed lets make freeze meta againQuote:
Originally Posted by Mrbrad2007
Yap , may be a little buff .
Thanks for your supportQuote:
Originally Posted by scolidon999