Printable View
If we look back at th7, you get an extra army camp (50 troop capacity) as well as an extra barrack for those 50 spaces. Resulting in one barrack to 50 troops. Then one barrack to 55 troops at th9.
Now th10 have a 240 camp capacity, I think its justified to an additional barrack for th10 to bring the ratio back down to one barrack to 48 troops.
Thoughts?
I'd agree, but what about the addition of two dark barracks that have already been implemented? This would make the total barracks amount up to 7,
No, I don't want a fifth barrack. If his happens, then the number of Baracks will be 5 and as you said the army camp space is 240. Five goes into 240 quite evenly and I think it would ruin the strategically queing of troops.
Give us another 1-2 barracks. The waiting time is killing me slowly.. Lol
:rolleyes:Yeah 4 doesn't go into 240 evenly....Quote:
Originally Posted by SilverSword
And no 4 barracks are enough if u count dark barracks which brings the total to 6.
My problem with this is th7/8 obviously has more loot available than th10 for raids, they fill their camps faster, require fewer cheaper troops to attack, have cheaper upgrades and search costs.
Th10 needs to have slower progression than th7/8, but I think the other factors handle this. But the upgrade cost and reduced loot from raiding handles this imo.
In terms of de barracks th8 and th10 are even, but the de barracks dont provide the versatility of the elixer barracks. Only viable options for farming are minions and to a lesser extent hog riders. The majority of people attacking at any th will be attacking with mostly elixer troops in their camps.
What a numpty. How can anyone argue against being able to build troops faster? Do you want to battle less?Quote:
Originally Posted by SilverSword
I'm as OCD as you could possibly get in CoC (having symmetrical designs / having to complete all walls etc) but I don't lose sleep over my barracks queue not being completely even. If that's what you're worried about.
Of course we all want 5, 6, 7 or 8 barracks. The same as we could all do with 6, 7 or 8 builders. Will Supercell give them to us? nope.
We'll probably have more barracks in the future, but not soon.Quote:
Originally Posted by Stitch
I think the idea of adding in an additional barracks, is not bad, I haven't had the time to think into it too much in depth, it is effectively a 20% reduction in build time, a nice bonus at whichever TH it comes at so it really is a quite a buff, and when exactly to implement it does need to be thought through quite hard, but it's not something I would rule out all together.
It does if you have 60 in each barrack. 60*4=240Quote:
Originally Posted by MrX
Sarcasm.... Read what the guy i quoted said.Quote:
Originally Posted by DragonxXx
Yep I have noticed my bad.. Excuse me.Quote:
Originally Posted by MrX
No, I don't want 6+ barracks, that would have an impact on the loot.Quote:
Originally Posted by Stitch
I think I made a valid case for another barrack at th10. It's not a ridiculous idea, allowing th10 to raid as often as th8!
Extra barracks are always welcomed... Especially at TH10.
I would definitely not be opposed to this.
I don't think a fifth barrack would be very helpful, because the total capacity of barrack plus dark barrack already exceeds the camp capacity. What would really add to the attack power is a fifth camp.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoshS
It's not about barrack capacity, that is meaningless in terms of time. Compare the time for 74 barbs and 37 wallbreakers and you will see how little it matters ha.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wenyan
This isnt about raiding power either, I can't think of anything more detrimental than a 5th camp if I'm honest. Attack would overpower defence to an unplayable extent.
The 5th barrack is about speeding up th10 raids to keep them inline with th7/8 raiding.
Whoops, I only thought of 5, but yes 4 does go into 240. Haha, but anyways, Do the barracks right now take up all the 240 camp space? If so, then no. If not, then yes we need a fifth barrack.
It would be great to have another barracks no doubt but I think it would make more sense to get more Dark Barracks since that is where new troops will be added and if you actually use it helps offset the time thing anyway.
But I'd wouldn't complain getting another regular one either
How do you build troops? Barracks don't take up camps barracks build units camps store units, the more barracks the faster you build units, the more units you need the longer it takes.Quote:
Originally Posted by SilverSword
TH7 = 180 units with 4 barracks if using barbarians thats 15m
TH8 = 200 units with 4 barracks is 16m 40s
TH9 = 220 units with 4 barracks is 18m 20s
TH10 = 240 units with 4 barracks is 20 Minutes; with 5 barracks is 16m....
This is the argument.... got nothing to do with how many troops a barracks can queue...
Th7 is 200 like th8, but this is my point yeah! ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Darkpye
Adding another barrack would indirectly lower troop cook time. While I would like this a lot and would not object to this at all but I think I rather see SC readjusting certain troop cook time more specifically wizards & balloons.
looks fine to me since you are making MORE troops so it SHOULD take longer.Quote:
Originally Posted by Darkpye
furthermore, it appears everyone is forgetting that MORE POWERFUL troops
are made at the same cook time. A TH7 could yell
"Unfair how they can make LVL 6 troops in the same time frame i make LVL 4 then
come down and attack me!"
This belongs in your discovery lab thread.Quote:
Originally Posted by SilverSword
This makes no sense. The argument about time to build an army is a valid one. Your comparison to th7 is not. People who are th10 have a huge penalty against th7, it certainly isn't profitable to attack them.Quote:
Originally Posted by Groovy