Star Scoring system

Ive been thinking the 3 star scoring system seems a bit behind the times. Its not difficult to 2 star your opponent in war most of the time.

In the pushing game, nothing really separates the guy that squeaks out a 50% 2 star vs the player that hits a 70% 2 star.

I think a 5 star scoring system seems more appropriate given the way the game has changed. Im not sure of the exact values on percentage detroyed results in a star but i think it could add some strategy to war and separate the highly skilled and the less skilled in the pushing game.

I dont see a downside to it. Thoughts?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DeputyDonkey

Ive been thinking the 3 star scoring system seems a bit behind the times. Its not difficult to 2 star your opponent in war most of the time.

In the pushing game, nothing really separates the guy that squeaks out a 50% 2 star vs the player that hits a 70% 2 star.

I think a 5 star scoring system seems more appropriate given the way the game has changed. Im not sure of the exact values on percentage detroyed results in a star but i think it could add some strategy to war and separate the highly skilled and the less skilled in the pushing game.

I dont see a downside to it. Thoughts?

---

Elaborate pls. We don't want a game thats too complicated keep it simple for all ages.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Josette2

Elaborate pls. We don't want a game thats too complicated keep it simple for all ages.

---

I think they mean like other games do it where they take into account several things.

Destroy TH equivalent = 1 star
Destroy 50% = 2 stars
Destroy 100% = 3 stars
Destroy 100% under certain time = 4 stars
Etc

But then what do I know

It's been a while since I have seen the suggestion but it is suggested many many times.
And it should be posted in https://forum.supercell.com/forumdis...ature-Requests instead of general.

Wouldn't mind seeing a star system revamp of some kind. Would like to see a star awarded for every defend in clan wars. Had 3 scout attacks on my base last war for zero stars by lower level ths trying to pull the cc. Think there should be a cost vs reward for such attacks.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Klepto

I think they mean like other games do it where they take into account several things.

Destroy TH equivalent = 1 star
Destroy 50% = 2 stars
Destroy 100% = 3 stars
Destroy 100% under certain time = 4 stars
Etc

But then what do I know

---

Yes this was what i was getting at. Perhaps instead of the th being the only objextive they add a second objective(clan castle?). It could affect how you prioritize what to attack and how.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by wilsonatore

Wouldn't mind seeing a star system revamp of some kind. Would like to see a star awarded for every defend in clan wars. Had 3 scout attacks on my base last war for zero stars by lower level ths trying to pull the cc. Think there should be a cost vs reward for such attacks.

---

there is already a cost, you don't have unlimited attacks, besides supercell is doing the opposite by rewarding failed attacks.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mcleo

It's been a while since I have seen the suggestion but it is suggested many many times.
And it should be posted in https://forum.supercell.com/forumdis...ature-Requests instead of general.

---

Yeah i ran a search but was unable to find anything on it. My mistake for dropping it in general.
Mods please move if need be

3 star war system works. not confusing. there should be something rewarded for a base defend in war.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dams05

there is already a cost, you don't have unlimited attacks, besides supercell is doing the opposite by rewarding failed attacks.

---

True, but when you poke low level ths at the bottom of the map, knowing full well they'll never draw a mirror they can 3 star, you're looking for an advantage at the top. If you choose to use these bases as scouts to further that advantage, should be an added cost.