What is supercell doing to Nerf .5 exploiters?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by orangemojo

lol that 30/30 th8.5 is in no way the defensive weight of a th8. its a mid th9 atleast

---

And, if the ONLY things he did were existing walls & AQ, th8 drags or GoHo would have at least some chance of 3 star. You can't bury your heroes as deep with a TH8. Back in the real world, that 8.5 gets punished by the guy with a mid level th9, which is why you'll probably never see such a base.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by afako

What is supercell doing to Nerf .5 exploiters?

---

Give you a tissue for your tears. I know people who make threads like this are mad they maxxed defense first. Honestly a .5 approach is the best way to be competitive at the earlier th stages as far as war goes. It actually takes work to make them though. A .5 requires far more effort than defense bots protecting your loot when you're sleeping or working.

Making a farm base to protect your loot when you're not there is botting.... In the strictest sense of the definition.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by URaTOWELL

Lol that's exactly what's gonna happen. If you adjust war weight .5 will bring in the same Town hall as yourself with stronger defenses. RIP .5 can't nerf defenseless without it affecting .5s

---

As it should be.
.5s should go by quick, not parked at for months and months. These guys farming up 30/30 heroes at 8.5, completely unnecessary, drop your damn xbows! I personally spent less than 2 months as a 9.5 before I could 3 star low/mid th10s. Can't say much for 10.5 but I can say it is def the worst offender of the 3.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by str8grizleh

As it should be.
.5s should go by quick, not parked at for months and months. These guys farming up 30/30 heroes at 8.5, completely unnecessary, drop your damn xbows! I personally spent less than 2 months as a 9.5 before I could 3 star low/mid th10s. Can't say much for 10.5 but I can say it is def the worst offender of the 3.

---

a perma .5 looks cool though...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by orangemojo

a perma .5 looks cool though...

---

Lol great argument hope the devs are reading this.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Redviper42

Im shocked at how many are so pro .5/engineered. Two things i want to throw in the ring is: 95% of these .5s/ engineered are bullying lower ths. A 9.5 is likely to hit a 9, a relatively easy 3 with little or no skill at all. Sure a 9 can three a 9.5 in return, but much more SKILL is involved(weaker troops, less troops, less spells)The theory of going .5 when a new th, i cannot argue. This is a smart way to upgrade. The problem with this, again many are taking advantage, just going up to next th for extra troops and spells, which currently weigh next to nothing. I think just add a little more weight to troop capacity, spell capacity, and certain "war troops" would help. My second point is my clan, who are mostly maxers, have decided to "join" them if SC doesnt do anything about it. Sadly i am NOT excited about this notion. Bully attacks are boring. An all .5/engineered clash meta would would be 3 star fest, and frankly not challenging and boring. Long term for the games sake, something needs to be adjusted.

---

I agree with the 9.5 v 9 scenario & have been in a few wars where our top guys were matched with multiple Th9.5s. We managed to win a couple of those wars because the .5s on the other side weren't very good.

The .5 option is something that is pretty do-able by any player. I'm doing it now, but it's not my plan to remain a .5 once I can hope to 3 star full th10s. And, I'm expecting the benefits of staying .5 too long will be gone as MM is updated.

The extreme engineered accounts like URaTOWELL have max th11 troops with little to no defense are using their attacks at the very top of the other clan. That type of account is not something many people can come up with, which is why many of us feel like MM needs to be tweaked to reduce the advantage.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by URaTOWELL

Lol great argument hope the devs are reading this.

---

if sc listened to every whiner we might as well not have a game

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by orangemojo

if sc listened to every whiner we might as well not have a game

---

Damn might have to change my signature

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by orangemojo

if sc listened to every whiner we might as well not have a game

---

Calling anyone who disagrees with your opinion a whiner, isn't exactly a convincing argument.

Does SuperCell want a game that has the outcome of wars largely dependent on massive spending? Maybe they do, but I expect very few people will play that game. Game companies that ignore the majority of their players in favor of a few big spenders, don't last long.

Does it say in the ToS somewhere that you MUST build an inferno tower immediately when you go to townhall 10?

Sound ridiculous?

Because it is. Your base is bad and you are a liability to your clan. Get over it