How to Solve the "Mass Troop Spam"

The Problem:

A particular troop will be mass spammed.

Evidence of this type of attack:
Mass Dragons
Mass Witches
Mass Bowler (with a few healers)
Mass Miner
Mass Valk

This is considered to be undesirable by the War community and Supercell.

The Solution:

Limit the number of a single troop type that can be brought to bare via a limit on housing space.

How it works:
Supercell codes in a limit via housing space on the number a single type of troop that can be added IE:
80 Housing Space limit would mean 4 Dragons, 10 Valks, 80 Barberians, 13 Bowlers, 16 Hogs/Giants/Balloons/Miners
20 Wizards or 6 witches.

(Note I am not saying 80 housing space is ideal it's just an example before you kick off)

The Benefits:

• This prevents mass attacks that the war community and Supercell dislike.
• Supercell no longer needs to continue the Buff-Nerf cycle as over powered troops cannot used en-mass.
• Supercell can buff troops such as the Witch which has seen a decline in use due to nerfs without the worry of over-powering them.

I hope this idea for a solution is viable, and solves the issue for everyone concerned.

Mass dragon, wut? Lol


I'm aware that mass dragon is a strat, but is it REALLY that bad of an issue?

I don't use any of these mass troops spams you speak of. I didn't even know they were a problem. Aside from mass dragon attacks in war, I haven't seen any in a long time.

Someone did revenge attack me with mass witches long ago, but I had it coming. They completely wrecked my base for 3 stars easily. The pile of skeletons really was a treat to watch run over my base.

What you suggest puts a limitations on the way people can play the game. I can't get behind that idea.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by fuzzyduck22

I don't use any of these mass troops spams you speak of. I didn't even know they were a problem. Aside from mass dragon attacks in war, I haven't seen any in a long time.

Someone did revenge attack me with mass witches long ago, but I had it coming. They completely wrecked my base for 3 stars easily. The pile of skeletons really was a treat to watch run over my base.

What you suggest puts a limitations on the way people can play the game. I can't get behind that idea.

---

Th10 and above its mass bowler, TH9 and below its mass valks, less diversity and more of just 2 things, and they get 3 stars by simply creating a funnel into the core where they have access to the rest of the base essentially, and they can overrun everything because there are so much of it, but many are complaining more now on the bowlers than the valks. Miners are even worse. Just a cc golem, 2 wizards, and 46 miners. Use the golem+wiz+heroes to kill the cc, and then swipe your foot across the screen with the miners and bam, 3 stars. The queen isn't an issue because she lures miners in, infernos don't do much because dropping a heal while they are underneath just lets them fight a little longer, they move too fast, and they can avoid most traps. Witches died, I don't know what OP was getting with that, there haven't been mass witch in a while now.

I am a th 10 and have yet to upgrade the barracks for miners. If they are getting 3 stars on th 10s and above with mass miners sign me up! Lol.

Honestly, I didn't think the miner was that valuable of a 3 star troop just by reading the description. It sounds like they need to nerf the healing of an underground miner. Problem solved.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by fuzzyduck22

I am a th 10 and have yet to upgrade the barracks for miners. If they are getting 3 stars on th 10s and above with mass miners sign me up! Lol.

Honestly, I didn't think the miner was that valuable of a 3 star troop just by reading the description. It sounds like they need to nerf the healing of an underground miner. Problem solved.

---

Don't forget the rage, they sometimes don't even need a heal, rage and everything dies (building wise) players are trying to place skeleton traps around infernos since miners aren't splash/AOE troops to make them easier to take out, picture it with the GW and its health buff.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BbaBaba123

Don't forget the rage, they sometimes don't even need a heal, rage and everything dies (building wise) players are trying to place skeleton traps around infernos since miners aren't splash/AOE troops to make them easier to take out, picture it with the GW and its health buff.

---

That is how I use my skeleton traps anyway.

I have yet to see a miner in action. Probably why I didn't know this was going on. I haven't watched any youtube videos of attacks since the update either.

This can be cured the same way they did with mass hogs. GBs are theoretically placed underground. At least, I like to think of them the same as I do a land mine. That is exactly where the miners roam free. I feel they should trigger all bomb traps, but go underneath the spring traps. And, since those bombs are going off right in those miners ugly mugs, I feel they should do x1.5 damage. Same as with the hogs.

I'm not with putting limitations. But lets take the example of the newly added mini dragon which does better when alone. This could be a solution. Make troops do better when in small amounts at the same times & do a standard damage when more than that. People will start finding combos & different strategies will come up from that!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 0Maximus0

This is considered to be undesirable by the War community and Supercell.

---

I question this statement and whether this is any "problem" to be solved. First off, most clans war. The concept that there is a small, select community within the game is ridiculous as is the notion that any one player can come on the forums and speak for all clans who go to war. And although Supercell adjusts the game to keep it competitive, I don't really believe that the number of troops being deployed factors into it. In my opinion, it's always the losing clan who questions the tactics of the winning clan. It usually boils down to "Hey, that clan cleaned our clocks! Not fair! It's so OP!" but when someone asks them, "Why don't you try the same thing?" the excuses vary from "we think it's too expensive to actually win the war" to "we like to purposely limit ourselves because we think that's fun and we want to force other clans to have the same kind of 'fun'."

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SharkyFinn

I question this statement and whether this is any "problem" to be solved. First off, most clans war. The concept that there is a small, select community within the game is ridiculous as is the notion that any one player can come on the forums and speak for all clans who go to war. And although Supercell adjusts the game to keep it competitive, I don't really believe that the number of troops being deployed factors into it. In my opinion, it's always the losing clan who questions the tactics of the winning clan. It usually boils down to "Hey, that clan cleaned our clocks! Not fair! It's so OP!" but when someone asks them, "Why don't you try the same thing?" the excuses vary from "we think it's too expensive to actually win the war" to "we like to purposely limit ourselves because we think that's fun and we want to force other clans to have the same kind of 'fun'."

---

• There is are people who identify as being part of the war community, I didn't coin the term I'm merely using it.
• It's not ridiculous to use a term that people use to identify themselves with.
• If you don't believe that Supercell adjust the game based on the use of mass troops then you clearly don't read the forums enough or the patch notes. (Hint: Witches being nerf multipul times because of them being used en-mass). This brings to mind a question of how you acquired your "Specialist" title. No offense indented.
• My "clan" isn't complaining about mass troops however it's being spoken off often enough that I felt I'd offer a solution if you don't like it that's fine it's impossible to make 100% of the player base happy 100% of the time.