Originally Posted by
Daddyhwhite33
I'm finally gonna chime in on this subject (I actively avoid drama).
I don't understand a couple of things about this argument.
First, why all the hate from each side? Can people not just accept that everybody likes to play this game a little differently? Granted, I have seen a few forumers go out of their way to be civil (thank you), but each side has it's proponents that refer to the other side with disgust. They say "Maxxer" or "Engineered" like they are dirty words SMH.
Second, my clan faces clans with engineered accounts on occasion (1out of every 10wars maybe), and have faced 3-4 severely engineered clans. We have won every single war except one, and that was not because of their engineered accounts. It was because I botched a pivotal attack. So, for any clan running th9 and below wars, victory or defeat rest cleanly on your shoulders unless you're matched to a clan with th10+ defenses, or a great deal many more high lvl th9s. To those with th10+, I cannot comment.
I wanna end by saying that both sides of this argument have validity.
People that max all/most of their base usually want to face very similar clans in war, and don't like the fact that engineered clans have more strong high-end attacks.
People that engineer bases for war are usually really into war, and have invested alot of time(or money) into giving their clan those extra high-end attacks. They don't wanna be put out into the cold after all their hard work. Who would?