I was attacking the other night in Clan War, my kings health was almost gone, and then I popped the ability. When I popped the ability, there were about 4-5 wizards surrounding the king, attacking an Archer tower. The king was obviously in rage when I popped the ability, but the wizards were not affected. So I believe troops that are around the king should be raged, but only when the ability is used.
I like the idea of this. Although another nerf should be done to the King to keep him balanced. For example, reduce the effect of the rage to only a small buff.
Thank you! I agree, the rage effect shouldn't be too dramatic.Quote:
Originally Posted by TheScavenger350
ok sorry but he is called BARBARIAN! king which means only barbarians, next time think about the name and what the hero is next time because it makes sense for them only to affect the troops that they were e.g: barbarian king used to be noral barbarian, he found dark elixir and he grew and became the king just like archer queen, so dont say that sort of thing just use rage spells on wizards
Shut up.this is a good idea.
What seems more convenient to you? Paying over 30,000 elixir just to rage 6 wizards, or using the kings ability on wizards, which is completely FREE? You decide, my friend. Simple :).Quote:
Originally Posted by swagtrapswag
It doesn't matter at all what is convenient to us, but what is convenient to SuperCell. Therefore, this won't happen. Anyways, I don't think it is a good idea for him to rage anything more than barbs, because no matter what, he will always enrage at least 8 troops other than himself. In that sense, his ability is better than the Queen's because the AQ does not make the archers she spawns invisible.Quote:
Originally Posted by Goempel
^Quote:
Originally Posted by Dvs
This guy, knows his stuff.
This is a terrible idea! It would be a free rage that moves where your king moves, plus the king gains significant health! It would be way too op.
If you READ the second response to the topic, then you will see that the kings rage will not have full effect on the troops like the rage spell. The troops would not gain health, only the hero would.Quote:
Originally Posted by zoelem
You never know, remember, the dev team reads majority of the ideas in this forum.Quote:
Originally Posted by Iainthedestroyer
:heart: this idea. rage usaly effects the troos when u use the spell so it should have the same effect when the king uses it
No, but BK raging is a bit sad.
My alternative idea is to have the BK-rage rage every barbarian on the map, not just within a small circle.
You clearly didn't read the rest of my comment.Quote:
Originally Posted by Goempel
Why don't we just make the AQ make every other troop invisible. BECAUSE IT RUINS THE BALANCE. Why not just bring an extra rage spell, and use it on those extra wizards.Quote:
Anyways, I don't think it is a good idea for him to rage anything more than barbs, because no matter what, he will always enrage at least 8 troops other than himself. In that sense, his ability is better than the Queen's because the AQ does not make the archers she spawns invisible.
Perfectly said. This would make the rage spell a lot less useful. Think about it people. For a certain farming raid I do, I rage my three valks and king once they Rachel the center. With this, I could just use the ability and have more space for another heal!Quote:
Originally Posted by Iainthedestroyer
Too OP, not a good idea.