POLL - Battle Timer limit

To facilitate the kill-squad SC boasted in their last conference, they added an extra 30 seconds to the old 3 minute limit. It was also beneficial since 4 or 5 new structures were added to TH9 in 2 updates. This required an extra 10-15 seconds to destroy them. (Air sweepers, DE spell factory, increased structure HP accounted for another 2 by proxy)

So, the question is, what do you feel the time should be to complete an attack?

For a TIER BASED TIMER that increases with TH level, see this poll.
http://forum.supercell.net/showthrea...iered-Increase

3 minutes at th9, and 3:30 at th10+.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Raulhnajera

3 minutes at th9, and 3:30 at th10+.

---

You should reevaluate that. 1 level increases 30 seconds. A bit much considering there are only 8 new structures. TH9 should be 3:15 by that logic.
I think it should incrementally increase with TH level beginning at TH8. 10 to 15 seconds per TH level above 8 would be good without being overly compensable.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bobofclashofclans

You should reevaluate that. 1 level increases 30 seconds. A bit much considering there are only 8 new structures. TH9 should be 3:15 by that logic.
I think it should incrementally increase with TH level beginning at TH8. 10 to 15 seconds per TH level above 8 would be good without being overly compensable.

---

Agreed. Big fan of the graduated increase in time... th8 @ 3m, th9 @ 3:15, th 10/11 @ 3:30... At least for now... see how it goes.


Since the original move to 3:30, pretty much everyone agreed it was only necessary for th10+... this all or nothing approach taken by SC seems to lack understanding of game play... Unless, of course, they can show us some data to back up their decision - Would love to see a histogram of 3 star attack times in 5 second buckets for each th level from 8 upwards...

Someone please tell me they did at least this much basic research to support their decision

Get more votes if you start this poll in general chat where every 10th thread is about this issue

Why is there a timer at all? If your defenses/layout can't protect your base you should lose. You shouldn't win by default because the attack takes to long. I always thought 3m was too short and regularly lost attacks simply because of the timer. At 3:30 this became a lot more rare, but still happened occasionally. They should just make the timer 5 minutes, to keep people from tying up your base too long, but long enough for even the slowest attack to finish.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan203

Why is there a timer at all? If your defenses/layout can't protect your base you should lose. You shouldn't win by default because the attack takes to long. I always thought 3m was too short and regularly lost attacks simply because of the timer. At 3:30 this became a lot more rare, but still happened occasionally. They should just make the timer 5 minutes, to keep people from tying up your base too long, but long enough for even the slowest attack to finish.

---

I agree with no limit, but only for wars, regular attacks could go on for an hour if someone wanted to not let you play.

They want use to use 4-5 steps/groups of troops in order for us to get 3 stars, but yet we don't have the time to do so

It should increase by 10 secs for each th past th8.

3:10 for th9, 3:20 for th10, 3:30 for th11.

If we are looking at one standard time across the board for all Th levels, Ill vote 3:15. I would much rather they kept the 3 minutes for TH9 and below and gave 10s and 11s 3:30 but if its not possible then a middle ground can be found. 3 minutes for the higher halls is simply not enough time.

3:30 - because the more complex and creative attacks with kill squads take more time!