A Way For Leaders To Finally Control Who Attacks Who

Hello. This is an idea that stems from many complaints from clan members, people on the forms, and global chat. I have heard it a lot, and decided that something needs to be changed. Here is an idea of what that change could be.

The Problem: Clan members who attack much higher than their number just to get the 1 star loot bonus, forcing other members to attack low just to win the war.

The Solution: A way for leaders to control who members attack.

Perhaps the leader could assign a clan wide base cap, meaning that every player could only be allowed to attack a certain number above/below their number. This could be changed at any time during the war, and there could be options for the leader like "Mirror", "+1", "-1", etc. This could be assigned for the first attack of every clan member, so that no matter when they attack first, they have to hit the targets that leaders want them to. If this were the case, then leaders could assign the first and second attack limits at the beginning of the war while picking members to participate.

This would greatly increase the productivity of war clans that struggle with new members selfishly going for high loot. Please comment any hate, praise, improvements, nerfs, or any type of comment below. I love feedback!

Thanks for reading and considering this!

I think that it isn't as much a problem with the game as it is the players. Perhaps you need to find clanmates who are willing to attack properly and listen to the leader. For players to get better, they have to be given a challenge, and restricting them from attacking players a few places above them may prevent this. Also, considering the amount of posts about how unfair war matchmaking is, I think that this could make the 'issue' worse by locking a lower player into attacking someone who they will never beat. Maybe a less restrictive system that doesn't prevent players from attacking too far up or down, but gives incentives for attacking the leader's specified player. Just a few ideas :)

For me this is a bad idea. For one, what if the leader/co-leader (assuming co leaders got this feature also because if its leader only then this wont work) got some real life things to do? What now? You can't assign a lot of co leaders just to make this work. Because clan with lots of co leaders aren't organize at all. Second, even if leader/co leaders are active, members will feel suffocated cause of lots of restriction and no trust to members at all. That won't help members to growth in attacking base. Lastly, lot of clans don't do 'mirror' or +1/+2 anymore. Good clan talks about strategies on how to attack bases and troop composition. If higher member got low attacking troops but got high defense, you trust he can 3 star his 'mirror'?

This would give the leader more dictatorship. I like it!

This is a clan management problem, not an SC problem.