Originally Posted by
Crapidsmn
This thread reminds me of what a local politician said to me in a debate a few years ago.
I was making it clear what I thought of his views, and he had become flustered.
It was his turn to speak, and he said, "Let's just agree to disagree."
When it was my turn to speak, I asked him a simple question.
"When you make a law that puts someone in a cage over using a plant to treat their cancer, can that person just agree to disagree, and stay out of prison?"
Agree to disagree only works when one side isn't using force.
Supercell forcefully ended some playing styles.
When you defend the updates, you aren't asking me to agree to disagree. You're telling me to submit to subjugation.